Why the 'Raw Dogging' Team Beats the Factory Method

Breaking Free from the Manufacturing Fantasy

05.11.2025, By Stephan Schwab

Management often treats software development as an assembly line—imposing process frameworks like Scrum, SAFe, or OKRs in pursuit of predictability and repeatable output. But software is fundamentally different: it's discovery, translation, and continuous learning wrapped in code. This article challenges the manufacturing fantasy, arguing that true excellence emerges from "raw dogging" teams—small, skilled groups who rely on trust, automation, and direct feedback rather than ritualized ceremonies. When organizations confuse rhythm with results, innovation dies quietly in the name of consistency. The future belongs to teams who ship, learn, and evolve without waiting for permission from a framework.

There’s a certain mythology in management circles: that software development can be tamed by process, that predictability will emerge if we just impose the right structure — Scrum, SAFe, OKR, Lean, whatever acronym happens to be fashionable this decade.

It’s the manufacturing fantasy: that software is an assembly line, and developers are workers piecing together widgets from a predefined blueprint. The goal is “repeatable output.” The metric is “velocity.” The outcome? Mediocrity — at best.

The Myth of Method

Every method that comes from manufacturing assumes a world where the work is known. You can measure it, plan it, and repeat it.

Software is the opposite. It’s discovery, translation, and continuous learning wrapped in code. The work is unknown — and pretending otherwise just makes the unknown invisible.

When managers confuse software creation with assembly, they optimize for the wrong thing. They start policing the rhythm instead of the result. The team stops thinking and starts complying.

That’s when innovation dies — quietly, in the name of “consistency.”

The “Raw Dogging” Team

A raw dogging team doesn’t need the permission of a framework to think. They don’t hide behind process diagrams. They take responsibility — fully. They look at the real problem, talk to the real users, and ship something that works — today, not in a 3-month release window.

They don’t rely on rituals; they rely on trust, skill, and feedback.

They don’t need a “method consultant” timing their moves with a stopwatch. They use tools, automation, and code as extensions of their intelligence — not as bureaucratic theater.

They pair, test, break things, fix them, and learn faster than any team chained to a method ever could.

The Power of Flow Over Framework

When skilled people are allowed to work raw, flow emerges naturally:

  • Small, meaningful commits land in CI/CD every day.
  • Test coverage grows organically.
  • The feedback loop between idea, code, and user stays tight.
  • Problems are seen immediately — and solved in hours, not in retros.

You don’t need a “daily standup” to talk to your teammates. You just talk. You don’t need a “retro” to learn. You learn all the time. You don’t need a “definition of done.” You just know when it’s done because it runs, passes tests, and users smile.

That’s not chaos. That’s mastery.

The Real Enemy: Fear

What keeps organizations clinging to factory-style frameworks isn’t ignorance — it’s fear. Fear of losing control. Fear of accountability. Fear of admitting that real software work cannot be predicted, only navigated.

So instead of trusting the people who actually build things, companies install layers of process to make themselves feel safe. Ironically, those layers slow everything down — and make the risk they fear even greater.

Trust the Builders

If you’ve ever watched a true expert debug a production issue at 3 a.m., you know what real flow looks like. There’s no process guide for that moment. No index card or Jira issue helps. Just raw focus, creativity, and teamwork.

That’s the essence of software development — the fusion of logic and intuition in the service of solving something real.

And that’s why a “raw dogging” team — small, sharp, self-organizing — will always outperform a methodized, consultant-driven factory. Because where others follow rules, they follow truth.

TL;DR

  • Software is not assembly.
  • Process is no substitute for trust.
  • The future belongs to those who ship, learn, and evolve — raw.

Contact

Let's talk about your real situation. Want to accelerate delivery, remove technical blockers, or validate whether an idea deserves more investment? Book a short conversation (20 min): I listen to your context and give 1–2 practical recommendations—no pitch, no obligation. If it fits, we continue; if not, you leave with clarity. Confidential and direct.

Prefer email? Write me: sns@caimito.net